Does the employer have a legitimate interest that it protects by the non-compete agreement? The applicability of non-compete agreements in the state of Florida is quite common. Some law firms develop their law firms around these agreements and represent the workers, employers and potential new employers of a worker currently bound by a non-compete agreement. The agreement should not be too broad and is generally difficult to implement if it takes more than two years.  However, Florida courts rarely refuse to impose a non-competition clause because of its length or geographic scope. Instead, courts are required, under Florida law, to enter into a broad or long-term unauthorized non-compete agreement with “blue pencil” to do so under Fla. Stat.  Even if the agreement is part of a general employment contract, there is a possibility of prior infringement on the part of an employer. As a result, the non-competition clause of the treaty will no longer apply. However, recent appels court jurisprudence in Florida has eroded the usefulness of the previous injury defence.  However, recent findings, both in academic literature and in the popular press, suggest that this balance is overpriced. Studies show that two out of five workers, or 40% of U.S.
employees, were subject to a non-compete clause at some point in their careers.  It is estimated that in 2014, about 28 million Americans were working under a non-compete clause.  From Jimmy John`s famous non-compete clause to all his employees, including minimum wage sandwich makers and delivery drivers, to the stories of employers who are not for janitors, manual workers, custodians, and even unpaid summer interns, the news is full of examples of non-competitions. These competition bans restrict external employment opportunities for workers who, in practice, could not, by definition, hold confidential information or highly sensitive trade secrets about their employers. Overall, these widespread restrictions on worker mobility have demonstrable negative effects on wages and innovation.  The extent to which non-competition obligations are permitted by law varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For example, in the United States, the State of California invalidates non-competition prohibitions for all shareholders, except shareholders, when selling commercial interests.  Under Texas law, “a non-competition agreement is applicable if it is, at the time of the agreement, a side effect of another applicable agreement, provided it contains an area, a geographical area and the extent of the activity to be limited, which are reasonable and do not impose greater restraint than is necessary to protect the commercial or commercial will of the promised.”  Physicians are subject to special rules, including the fact that a physician cannot be prohibited from “continuing to care for and treat a patient during an acute illness, even after the termination of the contract or employment.”  For a worker who is required to protect the employer`s confidentiality and business secrets, the employer and the worker may agree to the inclusion of non-compete clauses in the employment contract or a separate confidentiality agreement. In the event of termination or expiry of the employment contract, the employer pays monthly compensation to the worker during the agreed non-competition period. If the worker does not object to non-competition, he pays damages to the employer as agreed.