Cost Sharing Agreement Definition

There are cases where the cost-sharing agreement includes a central company headquartered abroad. This is a very common agreement between multinationals (MNEs) that make the issue of taxation a little different, since these are the taxes in question: (i) technology transfer agreements (these contracts are often reimbursements for administrative costs and non-technical services); (1) In general. For the purposes of this section, a participant is a controlled subject who meets the requirements of this paragraph (c) (1) (controlled participant) or a uncontrolled subject participating in the cost-sharing agreement (uncontrolled participant). The definitions of controlled and uncontrolled subjects are contained in the provisions of S. 1.482-1 (i) (5). A controlled subject may only be a controlled participant if he – 1) the extent and application of the rules of this section. A cost-sharing agreement is an agreement under which the parties agree to share the development costs of one or more intangible assets in relation to their reasonably expected share of benefits from their individual exploitation of the intangible capital interests assigned to them under the agreement. A subject cannot argue that a cost-sharing agreement is a qualified cost-sharing agreement if the agreement meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. In accordance with the rules of page 1.482-1 (d) (d) (3),3),),),)),) (Identification of Contractual Conditions), the District Director may apply the rules of this section to any agreement that essentially constitutes a cost-sharing agreement, regardless of non-compliance with the requirements of this section. A qualified cost-sharing agreement or agreement to which the district director applies the rules of this section is not considered to be a partnership to which the rules of Sub-Chapter K apply. See No. 301.7701-3 (e) of this chapter. In addition, a participant who is a foreign company or a non-resident non-resident foreign resident is not considered a commercial or commercial activity in the United States solely because of his or her participation in such an agreement.

See general . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. Finally, it should be noted that cost-sharing agreements may result in additional litigation between a subject and the IRS. In the example shown above, there is a clear distinction between the revenues received by the parent company on intangible assets prior to purchase and the revenues generated by the parent company and the portion of intangible capital expenditures after the cost-sharing agreement came into effect.